External risk intelligence

Remote attackers can crash systems using X.Org libXfont

CVE advisorySeverity: CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8)

CVE-2007-5199

An external attacker can exploit a flaw in X.Org libXfont to crash systems or execute unauthorized actions, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information. This matters because it can disrupt services or allow code execution.

2Halo Surface Signal

Memory Corruption

X Libxfont

1.3.1

External exposure likelihood

Halo Surface Signal score for CVE-2007-5199

The vulnerability affects libXfont, a library used by the X Window System for font rendering. While it can be reached via network requests if the X server is configured to accept remote connections, X Window System traffic is typically restricted to internal networks or local sessions. Public internet exposure of an X server is non-standard and represents an unusual configuration.

Horizon Alert

Summary of the vulnerability and why it matters

This vulnerability in X.Org's libXfont could allow an attacker to impact a system by sending specially crafted data that causes a small memory overflow. This type of issue is concerning because it can be triggered remotely and potentially lead to system compromise.

  • Can affect remote users.
  • Potentially allows full system control.
  • Requires no special privileges.

Attack Path

How an attacker could exploit the issue

An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted font data to a system using the vulnerable `libXfont` version. This could lead to code execution or denial of service, depending on how the attacker crafts the malicious payload and how the targeted application handles font loading. The impact could be significant if the vulnerable application runs with elevated privileges.

  • Remote attackers can trigger.
  • Sending malformed font data.
  • Requires vulnerable application.

Live Threat

Current exploitation, exposure, and threat context

This vulnerability in X.Org libXfont allows for a remote single byte overflow, potentially leading to a crash or code execution. While critical in theory due to its network-accessible nature, the practical impact is limited as X.Org is rarely exposed directly to the internet. Attackers typically prefer vulnerabilities in more commonly exposed services.

  • Exploitation requires specific, uncommon configurations.
  • No public exploit code is widely known.
  • The vulnerability is very old.

Priority actions

Operational Fix

Recommended remediation, mitigation, and detection steps

Prioritize identifying and isolating any systems running X.Org libXfont 1.3.1, as this critical vulnerability allows for remote code execution with no authentication. Given its age and the nature of the vulnerability, focus on discovery and containment if immediate patching is not feasible.

  • Inventory all affected assets.
  • Isolate vulnerable systems from the network.
  • Monitor for unusual network traffic.

Frequently asked questions

What is X.Org libXfont and what is it used for?

X.Org libXfont is a library used by the X Window System, which provides the basic framework for graphical user interfaces on many Unix-like operating systems. It is responsible for handling font rendering, allowing applications to display text in various fonts and sizes. People use it to ensure that text in their graphical applications appears correctly and consistently.

What kind of weakness does CVE-2007-5199 represent?

CVE-2007-5199 is classified as a buffer overflow vulnerability, specifically a single-byte overflow in the `catalogue.c` file of X.Org libXfont. This type of weakness (CWE-119) occurs when a program attempts to write data beyond the allocated buffer, potentially overwriting adjacent memory and leading to unpredictable behavior, including crashes or code execution.

How can an attacker exploit the CVE-2007-5199 vulnerability?

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted font data to a system that uses the vulnerable version of X.Org libXfont. This crafted data is designed to trigger the single-byte overflow. It does not require any special privileges to exploit, and the vulnerability is not triggered if the font data is handled correctly.

Who should be concerned about CVE-2007-5199 based on its exposure?

Organizations should be concerned if their X Window System, and specifically libXfont, is exposed to the internet. While this vulnerability has a network attack vector, it's less common for X servers to be directly accessible from the public internet. Systems with internal network exposure or those running X applications that handle remote font requests might be at a higher risk.

What is a practical first step for running this technology?

A practical first step is to identify systems running X.Org libXfont version 1.3.1. If such systems are found, consider isolating them from the network to contain potential risks, especially if immediate patching is not feasible due to the age of the software.

References