External risk intelligence

Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation Risk.

CVE advisoryKnown Exploit

CVE-2010-3904

A vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets protocol can allow local users to gain elevated privileges. This could impact organizations by enabling unauthorized access and control over affected systems. The realistic business risk involves potential data compromise and system disruption by attackers

1Halo Surface Signal

Linux Kernel

before 2.6.3611.211.3116.068.049.049.1010.0410.105.06.03.54.04.1

External exposure likelihood

Halo Surface Signal score for CVE-2010-3904

This vulnerability is a local privilege escalation within the Linux kernel. It requires an attacker to already have local user access to the system to execute the crafted system calls, and it is not reachable over a network or via public internet exposure.

Horizon Alert

Summary of the vulnerability and why it matters

The Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol implementation contains a flaw that allows local users to elevate their privileges. This is due to improper validation of addresses obtained from user space. The vulnerability can be exploited through crafted use of the sendmsg and recvmsg system calls.

  • Vulnerable component: Linux kernel RDS protocol
  • Core weakness: Improper address validation
  • Main business impact: Local privilege escalation

Attack Path

How an attacker could exploit the issue

This vulnerability allows an attacker with local access to elevate their privileges within the Linux kernel. The attack targets the Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol implementation by exploiting insufficient address validation during specific system calls. This could lead to an attacker gaining elevated control over the affected system.

  • Requires local system access.
  • Exploits crafted system calls.
  • Results in privilege escalation.

Live Threat

Current exploitation, exposure, and threat context

This vulnerability presents a local privilege escalation risk within the Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol implementation. Attackers could exploit this by making carefully crafted system calls, potentially leading to unauthorized privilege acquisition on affected systems. Given its nature, this vulnerability requires an attacker to already possess local access to the system.

  • Likely attacker skill level: Low
  • Required access or conditions: Local system access
  • Business risk or urgency: Moderate

Priority actions

Operational Fix

Recommended remediation, mitigation, and detection steps

An organization can address this vulnerability by first identifying all systems running the affected Linux kernel versions. Subsequently, measures to reduce exposure should be implemented, followed by the application of vendor-provided fixes. Finally, validating the successful application of these fixes and monitoring for related malicious activity are crucial steps.

  • Identify affected Linux assets.
  • Reduce exposure or isolate risk.
  • Fix, verify, and monitor.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol implementation?

The Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol implementation is a networking component that provides reliable data transfer between applications. It is used for various purposes within the operating system, facilitating communication that requires guaranteed delivery of data.

How does CVE-2010-3904 allow privilege escalation in Linux?

CVE-2010-3904 is a weakness classified as Improper Address Validation (CWE-1284). It permits local users to gain elevated privileges by exploiting how the RDS protocol in the Linux kernel handles addresses from user space, specifically through crafted use of the sendmsg and recvmsg system calls.

What preconditions are needed to trigger CVE-2010-3904?

An attacker must have local access to the affected system to trigger this vulnerability. The attack involves making specifically crafted sendmsg and recvmsg system calls. The vulnerability is not triggered by network access or external user interaction.

Who should care about CVE-2010-3904's internal threat?

Organizations running affected Linux kernel versions on systems with local user access should care. Since the Halo Surface Signal classifies this as an internal threat, it means an attacker needs to be on the system already, rather than accessing it from the internet.

What is the first step to respond to this Linux kernel vulnerability?

The first practical step is to identify all systems running the affected Linux kernel versions. Once identified, organizations should consider measures to reduce the potential risk associated with these systems.

References