External risk intelligence

Ghostscript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.

CVE advisoryKnown Exploit

CVE-2017-8291

A vulnerability in Artifex Ghostscript can allow attackers to bypass security features and execute commands remotely. This impacts organizations using the affected software, posing a risk to system control and data. Mitigation involves identifying and securing systems that process documents with this software.

1Halo Surface Signal

Artifex Ghostscript

before 9.218.06.07.07.37.47.57.67.7

External exposure likelihood

Halo Surface Signal score for CVE-2017-8291

Ghostscript is a document processing utility typically invoked locally by applications or users to render, convert, or print files. It does not provide an internet-facing network service, interface, or edge-gateway capability. Exposure requires a local user or an application to explicitly process a malicious file, making it highly unlikely to be reached directly from the public internet.

Horizon Alert

Summary of the vulnerability and why it matters

Artifex Ghostscript is a software component that processes PostScript and PDF documents. A flaw in this software allows for bypassing security restrictions and executing commands remotely. This can lead to unauthorized access and control over affected systems.

  • Vulnerable component: Artifex Ghostscript
  • Core weakness: Type confusion bypass
  • Main business impact: Remote command execution

Attack Path

How an attacker could exploit the issue

The described vulnerability in Ghostscript allows for unauthorized command execution. An attacker can exploit this by crafting a malicious PostScript document. When this document is processed by a vulnerable version of Ghostscript, it can bypass security restrictions and execute arbitrary commands on the affected system. This could lead to a compromise of data integrity, confidentiality, and system availability.

  • Exposure condition: Malicious document processed locally.
  • Attacker starting point: Local system access.
  • Trigger and result: Document bypass and command execution.

Live Threat

Current exploitation, exposure, and threat context

The Artifex Ghostscript vulnerability presents a significant risk due to the potential for remote command execution. This could allow attackers to gain control of affected systems, leading to data breaches or further network compromise. Organizations should consider this a high-priority issue given the ease of exploitation and the severity of potential impacts.

  • Attackers could have low skill.
  • Exploitation requires user interaction.
  • High business risk and urgency.

Priority actions

Operational Fix

Recommended remediation, mitigation, and detection steps

This vulnerability could allow unauthorized command execution if a crafted document is processed. Organizations should prioritize identifying and securing systems that handle or process documents with the affected software. Reducing exposure and applying vendor-provided fixes are key steps to mitigating risk and ensuring system integrity.

  • Identify all systems processing documents.
  • Isolate or restrict document processing.
  • Apply vendor fixes and validate.
  • Monitor for related activity.

Frequently asked questions

What is the software context for CVE-2017-8291, involving Artifex Ghostscript and remote command execution?

CVE-2017-8291 affects Artifex Ghostscript, a software component used for processing PostScript and PDF documents. This vulnerability allows for bypassing security restrictions and executing remote commands, potentially leading to unauthorized system access and control. The core weakness identified is a type confusion bypass, enabling the execution of arbitrary commands when a crafted document is processed by a vulnerable Ghostscript version.

How does the type confusion weakness in Artifex Ghostscript (CVE-2017-8291) lead to vulnerability exploitation?

The vulnerability in Artifex Ghostscript, identified as CVE-2017-8291, stems from a type confusion weakness (CWE-843). This allows for a bypass of the -dSAFER security feature. By embedding a specific substring, "/OutputFile (%pipe%", within a crafted PostScript document, an attacker can trigger this type confusion, leading to the execution of arbitrary commands on the system processing the document.

What is the trigger path and scope negation for the Ghostscript vulnerability (CVE-2017-8291) concerning document processing?

The trigger path for CVE-2017-8291 involves a user or application processing a maliciously crafted PostScript (.eps) document with a vulnerable version of Artifex Ghostscript. The scope negation occurs through the bypass of the -dSAFER security mechanism, which is intended to restrict operations. This allows the execution of commands outside the intended safe environment, leading to remote command execution.

What is the relevance and threat advisory for Artifex Ghostscript's CVE-2017-8291, considering its exploitation in the wild?

Artifex Ghostscript, CVE-2017-8291, is relevant due to its exploitation in the wild in April 2017, allowing for -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution. The Halo Surface Signal assesses the exposure as 'Very unlikely' because Ghostscript is typically invoked locally and does not provide an internet-facing service, requiring local user interaction or application processing of a malicious file to exploit. This threat requires a local system or application to process a malicious file, making direct internet...

What are the practical response steps for organizations to mitigate the risk of the Ghostscript vulnerability (CVE-2017-8291)?

To mitigate the risks associated with CVE-2017-8291, organizations should identify all systems that process documents using affected versions of Artifex Ghostscript. It is crucial to isolate or restrict document processing on vulnerable systems and apply vendor-provided fixes as soon as possible. Validating the successful application of patches and actively monitoring for any related malicious activity are also essential steps to ensure system integrity and reduce exposure.

References