External risk intelligence

Hashcat could allow an internal attacker to execute malicious code or crash the program.

CVE advisorySeverity: CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8)

CVE-2026-42483

An internal attacker can exploit a flaw in Hashcat by providing a malicious hash file. This allows them to crash the software or seize control of the system, potentially compromising critical security operations.

1Halo Surface Signal

Out-of-bounds Write

Hashcat

7.1.2

External exposure likelihood

Halo Surface Signal score for CVE-2026-42483

Hashcat is a command-line, client-side utility used for local password auditing. It operates as a local tool and does not function as a network service, web application, or internet-facing gateway. Its usage is restricted to local processing of files by a user, which makes public internet exposure of the vulnerable component highly unlikely in standard deployments.

Horizon Alert

Summary of the vulnerability and why it matters

A heap-based buffer overflow in hashcat's Kerberos hash parser can be triggered by a specially crafted hash file. This vulnerability allows for a denial of service and potentially arbitrary code execution, making it a significant security concern.

  • Attackers can achieve complete system compromise.
  • Attackers can cause denial of service.
  • Requires existing access to the system.

Attack Path

How an attacker could exploit the issue

An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into running hashcat on a specially crafted Kerberos hash file. This would allow them to overwrite memory, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or a denial-of-service condition on the user's machine.

  • User must run hashcat.
  • Target is a crafted hash file.
  • Requires local execution.

Live Threat

Current exploitation, exposure, and threat context

This heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in hashcat's Kerberos parser could be weaponized for denial of service or arbitrary code execution through crafted hash files. Attackers might favor this for its potential to compromise local password auditing processes, although its client-side nature limits widespread, remote exploitation without initial access.

  • No known public exploit.
  • No KEV listing.
  • Vulnerability affects a local utility.

Priority actions

Operational Fix

Recommended remediation, mitigation, and detection steps

Prioritize identifying and blocking any network traffic attempting to deliver crafted Kerberos hash files to hashcat instances. Given the critical severity and potential for code execution, immediately investigate all hashcat installations and confirm their version. If hashcat v7.1.2 is in use, prepare to either update or disable the tool.

  • Update hashcat to a non-vulnerable version.
  • Monitor for unusual hashcat process activity.
  • Restrict hashcat execution to trusted users.

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary vulnerability in hashcat version 7.1.2 concerning Kerberos hashes?

Hashcat version 7.1.2 has a heap-based buffer overflow in its Kerberos hash parser. This flaw occurs because the length of account information is calculated from untrusted delimiter positions without proper validation before being copied into a fixed-size buffer, potentially leading to code execution or denial of service.

How can the heap-based buffer overflow in hashcat be exploited?

An attacker can exploit this weakness by providing a crafted Kerberos hash file to the hashcat utility. When hashcat processes this malicious file, the overflow can occur, allowing for denial of service or potentially arbitrary code execution.

What is the potential impact of exploiting the hashcat vulnerability?

Exploiting this vulnerability can lead to significant consequences, including denial of service, where the program crashes or becomes unresponsive. In more severe cases, it could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system where hashcat is running.

What is the relevance of CVE-2026-42483, considering its client-side nature?

While CVE-2026-42483 is a critical vulnerability, its relevance is somewhat limited due to hashcat's nature as a local, client-side utility. Exploitation requires a user to run hashcat on a crafted file, meaning it's not a remote, network-based attack. However, it remains a concern for systems where hashcat is used for password auditing if local access is compromised.

What are the recommended practical steps to mitigate the hashcat vulnerability?

To address this vulnerability, it is crucial to update hashcat to a version that is not affected by this flaw. Additionally, monitoring for unusual hashcat process activity and restricting its execution to trusted users can help prevent exploitation. Blocking any network traffic attempting to deliver crafted Kerberos hash files to hashcat instances is also advisable.

References